Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Chase
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-12T18:53:02Z
dc.date.available2016-06-12T18:53:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244.46/91
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2016, The Honors Undergraduate Research Journal, University of Oklahoma. All rights revert to authors.en_US
dc.description.abstractResearchers in both architecture and psychology agree that open office plans can have significant negative consequences for employees. This, though, is where universal agreement ends: researchers in both fields have struggled to identify specific and repeatable negative effects of open offices. Some studies have linked open plans to privacy concerns and decreased job satisfaction (Oldham & Brass, 1979, p. 267; Brennan et al., 2002, p. 279), but others have found better communication and increased job satisfaction for some types of employees (Zalesny & Farace, 1987, p. 253). Employee reactions to open office spaces seem to vary by task, organizational status, age, and a myriad of other factors, which makes it difficult for architects to determine how offices should be designed.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe mixed results on open offices are indicative of larger problems in the environment-behavior field. Psychological research should inform architectural design solutions, but before that can happen, communication between architectural and psychological researchers must improve. The environment-behavior discipline provides a forum for this communication, but current research in the field is published in several different journals and interested parties are unlikely to see all relevant studies. For example, environment-behavior researchers often ignore purely psychological research that might be relevant to their studies of behavior and perception.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews literature on open offices and personality characteristics to illustrate how psychological research can enhance environment-behavior research. Psychological research suggests that personality dimensions like introversion/extraversion may explain mixed responses to open offices, but personality factors are largely ignored in existing environment-behavior studies. Architects strive to design specifically for their clients and occupants, but are often forced to guess about how occupants will respond to a space. Improved communication between designers and psychologists may lead to better understanding of how different people react to the same architectural spaces.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Honors Undergraduate Research Journal (THURJ) is a publication of the Joe C. and Carole Kerr McClendon Honors College at the University of Oklahoma. The views expressed in THURJ are solely those of the contributors and should not be attributed to the Editorial Staff, the Honors College, or the University of Oklahoma.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTHURJ: The Honors Undergraduate Research Journal;Volume 15
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectOpen Officesen_US
dc.subjectPersonality Characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectPsychological Researchen_US
dc.subjectEnvironment-behavior Researchen_US
dc.titleSpace and the Psychology of Personality Types: How Personality Influences Reactions to Architectural Spaceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States