Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaddock, Monica
dc.contributor.editorAkhlaghi, Andrew
dc.contributor.editorGharipour, Elena T.
dc.contributor.editorBednarek, Ellie
dc.contributor.editorGellman, Jonah
dc.contributor.editorMcCann, Samuel
dc.contributor.editorSiddiqui, Wajeeha
dc.contributor.editorYoo, Jiyoun
dc.creatorHaddock, Monica
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T20:39:50Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T20:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244.46/63
dc.description.abstractThe legacy of the Iran-Contra scandal in the United States is irrefutable. Not only did Iran-Contra tarnish the Reagan administration, traumatizing the federal bureaucracy with criminal indictments, but it also exposed “the chronic tension between America’s democratic domestic political system and its nondemocratic national security system.”1 However, its overall repercussions for Iran remain more opaque. This paper seeks to ameliorate this lopsided coverage. This paper will examine the implications of the Iran- Contra affair on U.S.-Iranian relations in response to the following inquiries: Was the ostensible U.S. goal to sustain Iranian moderates merely window dressing? Which factions actually benefited from American military largesse? Was the U.S. responsible for the later political ascendancy of the pragmatists? And how did the conduct of foreign policy proceed afterward?en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Iran-Contra Affair first captured the popular imagination through Al-Shiraa’s anecdotal account of the bewildering choice of gifts the May 1986 Tehran delegation sought to woo its Iranian interlocutors with: an autographed bible and allegorical cake. According to Oliver North, the chocolate confection, which was later unceremoniously devoured by Revolutionary Guardsmen (during Ramadan nonetheless), was actually intended for the arms dealer Ghorbanifar’s mother. During the flight, a key had fallen into the icing and North opted to leave it there to conceal the dent with a deliberate looking flourish.2 This purported symbol of reconciliation succinctly describes the actual relegation of détente to an afterthought during this chain of events.en_US
dc.description.abstractTo address these queries, this paper will focus solely on the eastern theatre of operations and analyze the significance of the Iran-Contra affair within a trio of contexts: its germination via initial arms transactions under Israeli auspices, the blossoming of the scandal through greater American control over project management, and the aftermath from the end of the Reagan administration through the presidency of Rafsanjani. To conclude, this paper will make suggestions to improve future diplomatic relations between the United States and Iran based on this experience.en_US
dc.format.extent16 pages
dc.format.extent2,059,031 bytes
dc.format.mediumapplication.pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDānesh ; 1 (2016)
dc.relation.requiresAdobe Acrobat Reader
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectUnited States -- Foreign relations -- Iranen_US
dc.subjectIran -- Foreign relations -- United States
dc.subjectIran-Contra Affair, 1985-1990
dc.subjectMilitary assistance, American -- Iran
dc.titlean-contradiction : the implications of the arms-for-hostages scandal for U.S.-Iranian relationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeDocument
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.sponsorFarzaneh Center for Iranian and Persian Gulf Studies
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of Oklahoma. College of International Studies
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of Oklahoma. College of International Studies. Department of International and Area Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States